When Voice of Customer Surveys can Damage Your Brand
General web analytics, KPIs August 31st, 2008
This year’s buzz word in the world of web analytics is "Voice of Customer" or VOC for short. Essentially this boils down to presenting a survey to your web visitors asking them to respond to questions that can be used to ascertain how they feel about the web experience they have had.
Why voice of customer surveys are so useful
As you are no doubt aware, web analytics tools and methodologies are great for telling you the "what" and the "when" of your web site visitors. That is, what happened (a goal conversion event, a transaction, a specific pageview or a combination of pageviews etc. or any kind of engagement on your site) and when it happened (time/date, do they repeat the same thing over again and at what frequency etc.). This is quantitative data that is invaluable for identifying poor performing pages and poorly targeted marketing campaigns.
However, the missing link from web analytics has always been the qualitative data - the "why". For example, why did 30% of visitors leave your web site on that particular page, only view one page (bounce), not convert, not buy, not contact you, stay for less than 10 seconds etc. The only way to obtain such information is to ask them why, and a survey does just that.
In fact, without a survey, ascertaining qualitative information is often guess work. For example, following a site redesign, why has your time on site metric increased? Is it because users are more engaged with your content, or is it because they are lost in your new navigation layout? Taking a guess can lead to a very invalid assumption about your visitor satisfaction.
Surveys bridge the gap between anonymous, aggregate web analytics data (traffic) and the views of your visitors (personalised responses from individuals). As an aside, I strongly recommend that personalised responses also remain anonymous for best practice privacy reasons, unless of course the visitor expressly wishes to give their personal information.
When voice of customer surveys can damage your brand
So with so much to benefit from deploying a VOC survey, what can be bad…?
What I find quite astounding is the current trend to use pop-up windows as the method of survey deployment. That is, an unsolicited window pops up in front of the visitor (usually selecting visitors at random) requesting them to participate in a survey. By unsolicited, I mean the opening of an additional window without any action or knowledge by the visitor. This is not the same as a visitor’s action opening a new window - for example, the clicking a link or button.
Pop-up windows are one of the oldest and most annoying forms of interruption marketing on the web - a phrase I borrow from Seth Godin (whose books I highly recommend for viewing the bigger picture of digital marketing).
They are so annoying that they sparked the creation of a whole industry of anti-popup and ad blocking software in the late 90s and early 2000s. In fact, the pop-up blocking capabilities of the Google Toolbar was a main reason for its success – one of the most popular software releases ever, with an estimated 100+ million downloads to date.
Unsolicited pop-ups are simply to email spam. That is, hated by Internet users. Their use to display a survey, not only puts you in the category of a spammer – annoying your visitors, it is also likely to skew results. For example, consider the following scenario:
A happy visitor on your site enjoying their user experience becomes irritated with an unsolicited pop-up requesting their feedback. They either leave your web site, decreasing your survey participation rate, or provide negative feedback because of the annoyance.
Of course, it is possible they welcome the option to provide feedback, but how likely is that in reality? Probably just as likely that they would want to receive a spam email from you. It happens, but it’s so rare that that damage to your brand caused by the interruption, far out weighs any feedback gain.
For this reason, survey participation rates using pop-ups are very low - rarely rising above 1%.
How to increase survey participation rates and get better responses from the correct target group without hurting your brand
Here are some alternative ways at soliciting feedback from your visitors without the use of an interuppting pop-up. The key is to get as many engaged visitors to take part in your survey as possible – a higher participation increases the likelihood of obtaining a statistically relevant outcome.
As a guide, if you have 10,000 visitors, you need survey results from 370 visitors to be 95% confident in your results to a level of + or - 5%. That’s a participation rate of 3.7%
| Travel example | Retail example | How Google do it | ||
|
|
|
||
| BBC | SME website | |||
|
|
The rationale of these examples is to solicit feedback from visitors at both ends of the user-experience spectrum. Why? Because those visitors that are unhappy with their experience are always more likely to provide their views. This leads to the “squeaky wheels” syndrome. That is, you have to be careful not to assume that everyone feels the same way just because you have not received as much positive feedback.
Check list for a best practise deployment of a survey
- Avoid pop-ups – allow users to provide their feedback using a standard text link or button
- Keep it simple - use transparent language for requesting participation
- Add your participation request close to the call to action or user event you wish to gain feedback on
- Keep participation anonymous – or keep personal information optional
- Avoid random participation – provide all your visitors the choice to send their feedback. If people want to talk with you, they will!
- Deploy continuously – as with web analytics data, a continuous and ongoing survey system provides you with much greater insight than running a survey for a single campaign or set time period.
- Integrate survey results with web analytics click stream data (the subject of a future post )
Try my survey
I am obviously keen to understand my readership’s details and hear your voice - what countries are you from (my publisher first suggested 80% of book purchasers will be American, are you?), is there a need for me to publish in other languages, what type of organisations do you work for etc. etc.
Rather than interrupt you with pop-ups, I simply post a link to the here using the excellent SurveyMonkey tool.
The goal is to reach a 3% participation rate over a 3 month period, calculated as total respondents / total number of visits. I’ll post back the anonymous results as to how successful I am at getting respondents in a future post.
Email This Post
Print This Post


(7 votes, average: 4.14 out of 5)
August 31st, 2008 at 9:57 pm
The problem I find with voice of customer is that you are not able to select a representative group. Is there any evidence that the types of people who fill in online survey forms don’t just represent a minority profile with different preferences to those that don’t fill in the survey?
September 1st, 2008 at 9:23 am
Hiya Brian. Missed you by minutes in Murcia!
The BBC example isn’t so much to generate feedback as it is to build up user generated content as far as I understand.
I like the “inline” idea of asking for feedback - ideally at the point at which a person is interacting woth the site anyway… IE on a web form adding:
+ Answer two questions while you fill in this form to get free delivery
With the link revealing the questions on the page (not pop up).
September 1st, 2008 at 6:07 pm
I share your reservations about the pop-ups which is why we’ve never deployed them on any of the sites I work on.
But I am a huge fan of voice of customer data. That’s why I was very interested to read this post.
And that’s why I DO try, for example to get surveys embedded in as many e-commerce confirmation pages I can. Of course, that’s a very specific section of the visitors, but the comments from the free-text box are a real goldmine nevertheless.
Kampyle have an interesting approach to invitation, but a little too cutesy (and the survey examples I’ve seen with the smileys even more so) for some markets I think.
September 1st, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Nick: yes exactly - you need to avoid the squeaky wheels syndrome. The suggsted examples I give are intended to be agnostic. That is, whether you are happy or not with the experience, the call to provide feedback is intuitively visible and close to the call to action (or pain point!)
Dixon: Yes small world indeed! I love that part of Spain. I hear we are on the same panel at Stockholm SMX - see you there
Yes, the BBC site is there as an example of encouraging participation. It shouldn’t matter what the final intent is. The point is to generate engagement with your visitors.
Of course the BBC is in a unique position and isn’t really comparable with any business web site, but I wanted to use it because in terms of participation level, I don’t think there is a site out there that matches it. Even comparing to Facebook and Myspace.
September 1st, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Tim: That’s a good point. The only place where a pop-up is justified is on cart abandonment i.e when the visitor leaves the purchase process. They have decided not to buy from you, so why not!
The problem though, is that many sites require you to “add to cart”, or start the booking process in order to get the full price (travel is a good example of that situation). The result is that visitors regularly abandom the purchase process for perfectly valid reasons, and probably go on to purchase at a later date. So a pop-up survey for them is just as irritating.
Esstentially the point of my post was that with all the positive buzz around voc, I would hate to see the web analytics world take such a giant step back by using pop-ups for deployment…
September 2nd, 2008 at 10:17 am
Hi Brian,
Just read your book (which was excellent) over the holiday in Italy and now stumble more or less by coincidence on this post. It’s like when you buy a new car you all of a sudden see that make everywhere
Interesting post as surveying VOC is indeed something I’m recommending to all my clients.
Don’t you think that a survey that presents itself at the start of the visit (and is presented “from the brand” with logo and domain) which asks permission to survey after the visit is different from the examples you’re showing? The former builds a picture of the overall experience while I suspect that the latter I suspect is often used to comment on specific sections or pages?
Obviously I am referrring to the 4Q tool Avinash created with iPerceptions which does indeed use a lightbox (modern day popup) to present itself.
I’m not convinced it is so bad to be honest - people will see the lightbox when they come to the site. If they do not want to participate they simply click it away. Will they be annoyed? Maybe some, slightly, but so much that it really hurts the brand? You could be right but I am not sure. I hope to collect more evidence now that 4Q is localized into other languages then English.
September 2nd, 2008 at 9:53 pm
Sometimes hearing the customers opinion from time to time might be troublesome to hear but if companies want to grow they need to take the constructive criticism and build off of it…
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am
Thisj: my experience of running 4Q on a test site is that I do receive comments from visitors who have been annoyed. Things along the lines of “I WAS trying to do [whatever] until this survey…”
Other people have mentioned similar comments in the support forum. Although it’s true that the invitation can be dismissed and true that it does explain how the survey is intended to be ignored until the visit is complete, nevertheless there is evidence of people being offended. And these comments are from people to who took the trouble to voice their complaint. So it’s reasonable to assume that there will others, possibly more who did not even stay that long.
That’s why I have not yet dared use the system on a real e-commerce site even though I am a very strong advocate of ‘voice of the customer’ and would even go so far as to choose ‘VOC’ over traditional clickstream analysis if I was only allowed one tool for analytics!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:26 am
Brian,
Great post! And I even agree with most of it. A couple of points. VOC (surveys) can be used for creating engagement with your visitors or provide accurate measurement. If using it for creating engagement, an opt-in survey works fine. But, you will not get a representative sample and therefore you will not get an accurate measurement. If you are looking for an accurate measurement (incredibly valuable!) you must have a random sampling. Which means you must randomly intercept users and invite them to take a survey. We have had great success with this approach, averaging nearly 10% response rate over millions of surveys a year. With no giveways, prizes, contests, etc. Pop-ups, done well, with an invite first, is a great strategy.
You are right on with the value of attitudinal data and when merged with behavioral data they are a potent combination.
Another important point is voice of customer data is only as good as the methodology. And the methodology includes not only the survey approach, the questions, but also how the data is analyzed. While it sounds simple, most satisfaction measurement programs fail. Why? Their measurements are not accurate, precise, reliable and most of all, not predictive of the future. A satisfied customer will be a long term, loyal (and profitable) customer — when measured correctly. If you can rely on a proven (and I mean PROVEN) methodology, such as the American Customer Satisfaction Index (and the UK National Customer Satisfaction Index) your data will not only be accurate, precise and reliable, but also predictive and actionable.
-Larry Freed
CEO ForeSee Results (www.ForeSeeResults.com)
September 7th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Thijs: “Don’t you think that a survey that presents itself at the start of the visit (and is presented “from the brand” with logo and domain) which asks permission to survey after the visit is different from the examples you’re showing?”
- No, I don’t think this is different… the question is not how and when to display a pop-up to your visitors. That is working around what the visitor wants, instead of listening to their needs. The default for good visitor experience, is not to interrupt the them unless they request “assistance” it in the first place i.e. click on a feedback link.
Mitch: I couldn’t agree more. Feedback from dissatisfied customers is just as valuable as those that are satisfied. The positive feedback allows you to reward your teams that are performing well and encourage more of the same, while negative feedback are your opportunities to improve. The key is for the survey not to skew results by turning a good or even average visitor experience into a bad one with “interruption marketing” (I really like that phrase!)
Tim: I echo your experience and fears. I would only consider a pop-up if a visitor abandons a shopping cart/booking process. However, the caveat is that any web site that requires an “add to cart” action in order to ascertain the full price (e.g. travel) needs special consideration.
September 7th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
Brian,
Thanks for the very interesting post about VOC. There are few different methodologies available to get the VOC: Feedback Form, Surveys and Idea Management. Each methodology serves a different need. Generally speaking I would say that:
1. Feedback Form – if build right, placed all over the site, and have good analyze and management tools to support it – will provide you with high quality (i.e. specific comments) and actionable data, allowing you to read and manage feedback and also get back to the users. The feedback will be accessible to you only, allowing you judge it and decide what to do and how. This data can also be integrated into Web Analytics allowing you to understand both the ‘What’ and the ‘Why’.
2. Surveys – usually you’ll get high level understanding of what’s going on. There are the problems that you mentioned in your post as for how to initiate the survey, but they will allow you to ask your users for many questions you’re interested to hear answers for (e.g. how did you hear about my site). Well, there is also the obvious downside for asking many questions.
3. Idea Management – Have users suggest ideas, report problems etc., vote for other users’ ideas and have it publicly available to all. This can be very helpful to reduce your support efforts because some people will see that, e.g. in case of problem, its already a known one. It might also do good for some businesses looking to use their users publicly to vote for their next development steps. This solution can in some cases though damage your brand, in case lots of users have complaints, and others see it.
Based on our experience, adding a prominent feedback button (or link) with a quick and easy-to-fill feedback form will cause the users to provide not only high quality actionable feedback but also to provide variety of opinions. Many users provide amazing ideas and compliments as a feedback and a huge number choose to provide their real email because they want to follow up on their feedback.
Eran Savir
Co-Founder and VP Business Development at Kampyle (www.kampyle.com)
September 8th, 2008 at 9:10 am
Hi Brian,
Great post, while working at a large web portal, and being responsible for their User Generated Feedback program, the two things I found most difficult were
1. Dealing with channel owners and their priorities (Read generic feedback forms vs. channel(site section) specific form.
2.Volume of feedback -Contextual Analysis(We did develop an in-house text analysis tool, which analyzed free form text and categorized it into theme based categories with a positive, negative or neutral sentiment assigned to each theme.
I’d like to hear from you on any best practices around the above two.
Also, worth mentioning here as Eran pointed out was Idea management (check out http://suggestions.yahoo.com)
Thanks
Aman
September 15th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Eran: Great insight. I would say the biggest brand to benefit from such VoC feedback so far is Dell. Angus Cormie from Dell gave an excellent overview of this at this years’ London eMetrics summit, entitled “Listening skills at Dell”.
The 2005 Dell Hell story of Jeff Jarvis is legendary. His comments, and subsequently other user’s comments on his buzzmachine.com blog, undermined the company and its credibility in the eyes of millions who read, or more commonly heard about the reliability and support problems on the grape vine.
But Dell listened and responded with a huge investment in the three models you describe. Direct2Dell.com for example was their first effort of many.
I know Starbucks and Harley Davidson invest heavily in VoC - do you have any other examples?
Aman: I really like the Ideas Management of Yahoo (http://suggestions.yahoo.com). Looks like Eran could be a good contact for your questions.
September 17th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Very good post Brian. I always try to balance between my desire to know more about my visitors, especially with a startup and beta product like WASP, vs my own experience of being annoyed by pop-up/overlays ads and VOC requests…
But you were kind enough to leave a comment when prompted to do so on http://wasp.immeria.net stating how you disliked unsolicited VOC requests. I took a few minutes to write a post at http://blog.immeria.net/2008/09/voc-balance-your-desire-to-know-and.html
That being said, I’m becoming an advocate of Kampyle (and I see Eran is reading your blog too!). I find it a very good choice, being easier/friendlier than a SurveyMonkey and providing more in depth than something like 4Q.
September 17th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Stephane, you have inadvertently prompted me to make another observation about the perils of such VOC systems. I just clicked through to your site. As I type this, the relevant Firefox window (Title is now from your site) still tells me that it is ‘connected to cf.kampyle.com’ while displaying the previous page.
It looks to me as if a delay in retrieving the survey code from Kampyle has halted the rendering of the page. I’ve seen this happen with things like Thawte seals and learnt to keep such code way down at the end of the page, as with tracking code etc.
But if I am right (and I may not be, of course) then this is a ghastly lesson in how such systems can wreck customer experience.
The information and insight is hugely important. I can’t overstate that. I’ve learnt so much and made so many fixes on the basis of such information. But the mechanisms for getting it still need to be refined. For the time being I have to leave requests for the information until much later in the visit. I’d love to know what those low-page-view people were trying to do, but I dare not ask. Yet.
October 17th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
With no previous VOC data to go on we just deployed 4Q. Will we do it as an on-going collection method? That remains to be seen. But, we also had not heard of kampyle.
Maybe, we’ll try that next after we reach statistical certainty with 4Q.